Skip to main content

Choices

This does not seem so hard to understand:
In 1969, a Soviet dissident named Andrei Amalrik wrote Will The Soviet Union Survive Until 1984?, in which he predicted the collapse of the USSR. Amalrik, to whom I would later have the privilege to teach English, explained that any state forced to devote so much of its energies to physically and psychologically controlling millions of its own subjects could not survive indefinitely. The unforgettable image he left the reader with was that of a soldier who must always point a gun at his enemy. His arms begin to tire until their weight becomes unbearable. Exhausted, he lowers his weapon and his prisoner escapes.
You would have a hard convincing me that a majority of Canadians get that, or that a majority of people around the world get that. Everybody, it seems, is ready say "there ought to be a law" with nary a thought to what enforcement will cost, or how effective it could possibly be. In Canada we have laws demanding that everyone wear a bike helmet, for heaven's sake! We have laws dictating how much parties can spend on elections, we spend billions registering weapons (with nothing to show for it I have to add), and want to spend billions more on the Kyoto accord despite legitimate complaints about how anyone could know enough about that subject to warrant throwing the world economy a very hefty sandbag. Sure it's been warm over the last decade, but the planet has warmed and cooled many times in the past. How can anybody say they know - for certain - that the greenhouse theory is correct? Why is it almost taboo to question it? And now it seems that the Fiberal party is going to bring us taxpayer subsidized child care, with no provision to compensate stay at home parents. That means you must pay into it, but the only way to get anything out of it is to use it, despite whatever objections you may have to it in principle, and whatever you think about what they are teaching the children. It means, basically, pay up and shut up. What makes anyone think that the same people who brought us the Firearms fiasco, Kyoto, untold other spending overruns will be able to manage a program as large as this one will be? And Ken Dryden, who's leading the charge, says he's just getting started. I'll bet. What happens when all of those child care workers become unionized and get the salary and staffing levels that come with that? In all seriousness, give Canada twenty years on that path and there will be full blown riots as this country goes into meltdown mode. You want to pay for all of that on a Kyoto economy? People: You have to make choices about these things.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Hiatus will be blogged

This hiatus thing isn't going to plan. As I'm reading (books and blogs) I find things I think are interesting, or things I would like an opinion on, and bingo, my hiatus is in a shambles. So, *coughs*, until further notice, I'm blogging again. The main editorial difference that I can see coming from my few weeks away is that I do not expect to resume posting six out of seven days a week. There could be, at any time and without warning, a break of a week or two between posts. Really, I think that is the only way I can start to get some books behind me, and is also inevitable in the summer season when one wants to get out and enjoy it all. Here's a few things that got my attention this past week. Chris Taylor is blogging once again and has recruited an air force for the Red Ensign Brigade. Heh. Dennis Prager asks, Are you a liberal? Anglicans and Catholics are getting closer to reconciling -over the role of Mary in the Christian faith. Quote: A working group c...

Ghost in the machine

In writing up this post I have to mention that I am very impressed with the quality of discussion that one finds on blogs. This truly is a remarkable medium. Thanks go to all three of the bloggers mentioned here for providing such good reading and thinking for the rest of us to try and learn from. I have not had a chance to read all of the entries linked to here, but I do intend to. ***** George Will compares two views of man in his latest column . One is novelist Ian McEwan, who places the following words into the mouth of the leading character in his latest novel, Saturday : Endless and beautiful forms of life, such as you see in a common hedgerow, including exulted beings like ourselves, arose from physical laws, from war or nature, famine and death. This is the grandeur. And a bracing kind of consolation in the brief privilege of consciousness. This character is a neurosurgeon. The quote reminds me that there may be some truth to the observation that those in the biological and...