Skip to main content

Kerry is scary

From Thomas Sowell at the Washington Times (please go and read all of his books, he's worth reading):
Sometimes little things can tell you about big things. While Sen. John Kerry and his running-mate Sen. John Edwards were recently photographed at lunchtime at Wendy's, to show what regular guys they are, their real lunch was from a local yacht club, which is more their speed in real life. There is nothing wrong with eating lunch from or at a yacht club. What is wrong is being phony — and thinking the American people need to be conned. ... These guys are on the far left of a liberal party. What does that mean in concrete terms? Among other things, it means racial quotas, higher taxes, weakening the military, and — perhaps most significant of all — appointing liberal judges who will spend decades finding reasons to turn criminals loose and allowing frivolous lawsuits that drive up prices to consumers and destroy businesses and jobs. You can't run on that platform and win a national election. Moreover, you cannot frankly state the underlying assumptions of the liberal vision of the world, such as the notion the liberal anointed need to impose their superior vision on the masses. Politically, you have to pretend to be one of the people, even though the whole basis of your vision is that you are vastly superior to them. Even when you are a pompous elitist who looks down on the average American, you have to project a political image as a regular guy by being photographed with a baseball bat or a hunting rifle — or eating at Wendy's.
Don't forget that Kerry also brought up his Vietnam service during the democratic party nomination process, and now that much of it is turning out to be bogus, he is claiming that no one has the right to question that record. Well, why'd you bring it up then? Didn't think the guys you served with would point out that they think you're a dickless wonder? That you served for only four months? That you bugged out at that time, and pressed hard to get out, after your three purple hearts? And that at least one of those wounds may have been self inflicted? That the other two might have been for largely less serious wounds? That you went home to America and promtly slandered the entire U.S Army? Kerry says the Swiftboat Vets - men he served with - are Republican stooges. Really John? All 200 plus of them? All of them members of a vast, right wing conspiracy? The Wendy's antics are par for the course for Kerry. He claims to be Catholic, and makes a big to do about taking communion with as many press members present as possible. That action is irreconcilable with claiming, as Kerry has, that abortion is murder, but it is murder that must be allowed. He has mumbled something about how his position is "difficult to explain," which to me means he does not think he can or needs to explain it to peasants, or to anyone, really. Kerry is complete loser and the Wendy's fiasco is only the tip of the iceberg. American politics needs two viable parties for the system to work, and at the moment it has only one. It suprises me that Bush and Kerry are even close in the polls, but it is early yet. Most voters have not even tuned in. I don't think Kerry will fare well when they do. At the moment he has bouancy from the rabid anti Bush crowd, the kind that thinks paper mache heads at rallies are just the coolest. It saddens me that here in Canada we have been stuck with various John Kerrys, and have been for many years. The latest one goes by the name Paul Martin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi