Skip to main content

Liberals, the new Puritans

I just love this little cartoon. So often they take themselves just so-ooo seriously. The attitude is that anyone who disagrees with anything they say, well, they just must be stupid, or, more likely they're just evil. Isn't that right, Federal Liberal MP Carolyn Parish? Which is funny, because as best as I've heard it, radical libs don't actually believe in evil. It's only one of many examples of Liberal incoherence. Too often they remind me of silly little debate I heard as an undergraduate. A passionate young feminist was very forcefully arguing that there "were no absolutes, that's a given, we all know that." And she looks around top see if anyone - anyone - dared to disagree. And then she realized she her own claim was an absolute. It being the so PC 1990s, no one dared to say anything, although there must have been someone in the room who grasped that she was making a very old and fundamental mistake. Caught on her own harpoon, she went on to say that logic was just a form of western sexism and that the truth was beyond words and logic, but she knew what it was. She was working on it, understand? Her point and her credibility had just gone up in flames. I didn't know enough philosophy at the time to say it, but this is an ancient teaching point. It goes back to the very beginnings of philosophy and religion and there is a clear answer if you are not so Liberal your brains have fallen out. When you make the "no absolutes" claim you cut off the branch you are standing on. This fallacy still is used as a proof of the existence of God in some circles. You know, the kind of circles where proofs, history and truth are still valued. I doubt you'll see much of it on a university campus today. When I see this little dog relieving himself on the word Liberal, I just smile, and I wonder how many Liberals can't laugh at their own follies because their ginch is too tight. "Social justice is no laughing matter," they'll scream. And before anyone jumps on me, I'll concede that Conservatives goof too. The difference is that they don't think they can and must solve everything in the world from the ground up. They know humans are goofy little fallible creatures. And so they are often better able to smile and laugh. Their expectations are on a human scale. Posted by Hello

Comments

Rebecca said…
It's no coincidence that the little cartoon dog looks much like a certain little dog living in our house...

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi