Skip to main content

Bibby on Canadians and Religion

I followed up Nathan Bauman's suggestion from the comments section of my last post and found some information on Religion in Canada by Reginald Bibby. Bibby says:

In 1871 Catholics had a hold over 45 per cent of the Canadian population. Today they represent 44 per cent of the population.

So where are the changes? "In no religion," Bibby said. "No religion jumped up from below one per cent in 1961 to 16 per cent now."

So perhaps Canadians don't change churches as often as Americans. Bibby also comments on attendance numbers: "We see that the weekly attendance level has dropped down to about 20 per cent. Yet at the same time when we ask Canadians if they believe in a God that cares about them personally, about 80 per cent of them say they do." Bibby backs up some of my observations when he discusses what the future may hold:

"But as they get a little older they invariably want weddings, Baptisms, confirmations and funerals (and end up) reverting to the religious identification of their parents," Bibby continued.

"Within five years, one in three no religion people become something. Within 10 years, two in three become something. So if you don't get them on their wedding and you don't get them on their Baptism, you get them on their funeral."

... "Among 15 to 19 year olds we have seen in recent years an increase in the proportion of teenagers who are actively involved in the churches," he said, noting that World Youth Day had shown "young people are interested in God."

Thanks to Nathan for the tip! More here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wordpress

My move to Mac has been very happy except for two issues - gaming and blogging. For websurfing and multimedia, a Mac is of course a terrific machine. Games on the Mac platform are often ports of games made for the larger PC market and that means a Mac gamer will have to wait for the port. I'm not a heavy gamer by any means but I am very happy that the Mac port of Civilization 4 is finally here. Well, my copy isn't here quite yet - but it has been ordered and ought to be here soon. The blogging issue is more complicated. I'm not fond of writing my posts in a browser window. This goes back to when I was first blogging and I lost one or two large posts into the ether. After that I moved to w.bloggar - a great little app that let me compose on my desktop and then click send when all was said and done. I have not been able to recreate that experience on my Mac, and not for a lack of trying! I looked at Marsedit , but that forces you to compse while staring at a bunch of HMT...
Post a Comment
Read more

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi...
Post a Comment
Read more