Skip to main content

The Most Hated Ads

An interesting little look at the most hated advertising techniques on your computer can be seen here. I always wonder about the people that use techniques like these. Do they really think, for example, that I won't notice the fact that there is no close button on a pop up? How am I supposed to be open and respectful of them and their message when they are trying to stick their foot in the cyber door or trying to pretend they are a part of windows itself? I know enough to not click on the darn thing at all (right click on the windows taskbar and select 'close') but these creeps make it really difficult to teach computer phobic people - like my folks - and in effect drive them away from the computer altogether. It's an example of a kind of market failure. The seller is only thinking of the one transaction and not the larger issue of web functionality. If web functionality is driven too low, however, everyone suffers. I do consider myself a free market sort of person but I'm well aware that markets need minimal rules in order to function. Like stable currency, like the rule of law, the right to private property, etc. For now the only point I want to make is that there is a world of difference in how you handle an event that you perceive to be a 'one of,' and how you handle an event that you are likely to face again and again. The first sort is quick, brusque and short and the second sober, mature and balanced.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi