Skip to main content

Choices

This does not seem so hard to understand:
In 1969, a Soviet dissident named Andrei Amalrik wrote Will The Soviet Union Survive Until 1984?, in which he predicted the collapse of the USSR. Amalrik, to whom I would later have the privilege to teach English, explained that any state forced to devote so much of its energies to physically and psychologically controlling millions of its own subjects could not survive indefinitely. The unforgettable image he left the reader with was that of a soldier who must always point a gun at his enemy. His arms begin to tire until their weight becomes unbearable. Exhausted, he lowers his weapon and his prisoner escapes.
You would have a hard convincing me that a majority of Canadians get that, or that a majority of people around the world get that. Everybody, it seems, is ready say "there ought to be a law" with nary a thought to what enforcement will cost, or how effective it could possibly be. In Canada we have laws demanding that everyone wear a bike helmet, for heaven's sake! We have laws dictating how much parties can spend on elections, we spend billions registering weapons (with nothing to show for it I have to add), and want to spend billions more on the Kyoto accord despite legitimate complaints about how anyone could know enough about that subject to warrant throwing the world economy a very hefty sandbag. Sure it's been warm over the last decade, but the planet has warmed and cooled many times in the past. How can anybody say they know - for certain - that the greenhouse theory is correct? Why is it almost taboo to question it? And now it seems that the Fiberal party is going to bring us taxpayer subsidized child care, with no provision to compensate stay at home parents. That means you must pay into it, but the only way to get anything out of it is to use it, despite whatever objections you may have to it in principle, and whatever you think about what they are teaching the children. It means, basically, pay up and shut up. What makes anyone think that the same people who brought us the Firearms fiasco, Kyoto, untold other spending overruns will be able to manage a program as large as this one will be? And Ken Dryden, who's leading the charge, says he's just getting started. I'll bet. What happens when all of those child care workers become unionized and get the salary and staffing levels that come with that? In all seriousness, give Canada twenty years on that path and there will be full blown riots as this country goes into meltdown mode. You want to pay for all of that on a Kyoto economy? People: You have to make choices about these things.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi