Skip to main content

Books and glitches

I was waylaid last night by upgrading Firefox from 1.04 to 1.05. Firefox lost all of my bookmarks (most of which can be replaced) and forgot my toolbar customizations (easy enough to redo). It also started to do some other annoying things. It took a bit of time to get it all sorted and so, no post last night. The lost bookmarks also means that some of the things I had intended to write about might be lost if I can't find them again (or remember what they were). I may be busy for the next day or two as well, but you never know. I might sneak in here and put something together. While I'm here telling you stuff, I might as well tell you I got my latest package of books last week, including:
  • Augustine's Confessions
  • The Viking Portable Plato
  • You Can Understand the Bible, Peter Kreeft's latest.
  • and, finally, Volume One of Federick Copleston's A History of Philosophy
I picked up Augustine because I've never read anything he wrote and figured it was time to put that little bugbear to bed. I got the Viking Plato because although I've read the Republic through (it's excellent, esp. for anyone interested in politics), there's more to Plato than that. I'll start with the selections here for the time being. Viking offers a lot of these 'portables' and they're a great way to get a quick overview of a subject. Love'em. I got the Kreeft book because I have a long term goal of reading through the Bible and his overview - aimed at interested amateurs and not theologians - seemed just the thing. I have a heavy 'study' Bible that, despite it's weight, does not always have the answers to my questions, even though it has a lot of footnotes. Often the question is really broad, like 'what are the issues that this book is known for raising?' Finally, I've already eagerly jumped into the Copleston book. Copleston was a Jesuit Preist who wrote his nine volumes on philosophy as a guide for seminary students in the late 1940's and early 1950's. Yeah, philosophic study is encouraged in seminary. His series interests me because I think it will be in a little more depth than some of the things I've read (although Scruton can really get into it at times), and because I want to hear the story told from his point of view, which, I'm certain, will not be the same as that of the average academic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect ...

Wordpress

My move to Mac has been very happy except for two issues - gaming and blogging. For websurfing and multimedia, a Mac is of course a terrific machine. Games on the Mac platform are often ports of games made for the larger PC market and that means a Mac gamer will have to wait for the port. I'm not a heavy gamer by any means but I am very happy that the Mac port of Civilization 4 is finally here. Well, my copy isn't here quite yet - but it has been ordered and ought to be here soon. The blogging issue is more complicated. I'm not fond of writing my posts in a browser window. This goes back to when I was first blogging and I lost one or two large posts into the ether. After that I moved to w.bloggar - a great little app that let me compose on my desktop and then click send when all was said and done. I have not been able to recreate that experience on my Mac, and not for a lack of trying! I looked at Marsedit , but that forces you to compse while staring at a bunch of HMT...

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi...