Skip to main content

Another day for progress

Rascal Flatts have a song out called Mayberry, about a longing for the world that television show represented. It has a couplet that has always struck home with me:
Sunday used to be a day of rest, Now it's one more day for progress.
As someone who is new to thinking about himself in Christian terms, the whole concept of a Sabbath was one I have had to reflect on. I certainly don't spend all of my Sundays refraining from work and studying the Bible, but I have to come to respect the idea of a family and communal day. How often do we complain that we have no time for the people we love? For things we love to do? Who has not rued not speaking to an old friend because "I haven't had time." Who hasn't sighed that the gardening or some other favorite hobby is coming along poorly because "I haven't had time." Who hasn't wondered why their family isn't closer, or that they don't know who their neighbors are? How much could we improve these things by making better use of Sundays? If we all settle on one day for such things, we would have a lot less hassle scheduling time to spend with one another. The Sabbath and what we've done to it were brought to my mind by the first passage in this Sunday's reading, from Amos, a rather scary figure from the old Testament:
"When will the new moon be over," you ask, "that we may sell our grain, and the Sabbath, that we may display the wheat? We will diminish the ephah, add to the shekel, and fix our scales for cheating! We will buy the lowly man for silver, and the poor man for a pair of sandals; even the refuse of the wheat we will sell!"
Gutting Sunday shopping laws was passed as a way of increasing freedom, but freedom for who?And for what? If you have money you can go shopping on Sunday. That's a minor perk. But what about all the clerks and other people who now work Sundays, who are robbed of that time? They will have more money than before, it's true, but they've lost something as well. I would never seek to have Sunday shopping banned again. I don't oppose it on church and state grounds because everyone would be free to spend Sunday as they wished. You don't have to go to church. I would oppose it because I think it goes too far in terms of having morality legislated. People have to want to do the things that are good for them if they are to really appreciate them. Christians might get a better reception from the world if they were less quick to try and use government as a lever to produce the society they want. Social change is tougher than that. You have to convince people by argument and by example. But make no mistake, Sunday shopping favours those with the cash. They still have their leisure. Those without loose a day of rest and have their family life diminished. And we all have less of a community to share, in exchange for trinkets. I'm not above criticism on this count.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi