Skip to main content

The City of God

I like John Ray's blog and agree with him often, but I want to use one of his essays to point out a common error in often seen in public discussions of the merits of Christianity.
I agree wholeheartedly that Christianity is an enormously beneficial influence on ethical behavior but cannot see that it is essential or unique. And it certainly is not sufficient. We might think that Christ's central commandment "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" (Matthew 22:39) would be as firm a foundation for respect for the rights of others as one could possibly imagine but there are unfortunately very few Christlike Christians and savagery and tyranny have historically been far more common in Christian lands than anything else.
Just because someone fails to be all that a Christian should be, does not refute Christianity. In fact, the faith tells us that we cannot succeed, we are too weak, the cross is too great and thus we need God's Grace as much as possible. Grace can't be earned or bought, it can only be sought by sincere openness to God. Belonging to a church, even taking the Eucharist, is no guarantee of success at being Christian. As someone who says he is familiar with Catholicism, I'm surprised that Ray makes this error. The rest of the essay is not much better. He defines religion far too narrowly, I believe. People in Australia or the U.S., who say they are not Christian or even religious at all, can and do absorb Christian culture. It is in our laws, and our unwritten assumptions about how to interact with our neighbors. Before you slam the West for it's conduct, please take a look at the East (near East). And - very important - what kind of ideal are you accusing the West of falling short of? Chances are it is a Christian conception of what a state should be like, something Augustine might have called the City of God. We probably can't agree on the details of what that City should look like, but the silhouette is familiar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi