Skip to main content

Manitoba schools to bring back P.E. classes

Apparently the Province of Manitoba wants to bring Physical Education classes to back to its schools.

There's no shortage of culprits to blame for why your nine-year-old kid is 30 pounds overweight.

And if parents try hard enough, they can probably absolve themselves of blame altogether.

But the truth is, the only people to blame for today's fat kids are parents.

Parents, that is, who feed their kids daily doses of pop, candy and chocolate bars. Parents who serve their kids fatty foods on a daily basis, provide them with bowls of potato chips and cheesies every day, while Johnny is mesmerized in front of the TV. ... ... whether it's 30 minutes or 60 minutes [of P.E. class], it won't make much difference for the kid who has a chocolate bar, a can of Coke and a bag of chips in his backpack every day -- the same kid who comes home and has a helping of ice cream and fatty foods for supper, with no physical exercise between the school day and bed.

That kid is going to be fat regardless. And that's the parents' fault, not the school system.

Politicians can't speak in those terms because they don't want to offend anyone. And while I appreciate the Doer government is showing some leadership in this area, a more terse message to parents -- like get your fat butt off the couch and get active with your kids -- would probably have more impact. At least it would be reality.

Phys. Ed. is a good idea.

Kids should be introduced to a number of activities in school, in the hope that one or two will strike their fancy and keep them active even after they leave. Like the author, I don't like the mindset that says, the kids are fat so the government should do something about it. The first line of responsibility is in the home. But schools can play a part.

The movement to get rid of vending machines is also one that I support. They were brought into B.C. schools when I was a teenager, so that we could have things like scoreboards in the gym. Kind of a deal with the devil, don't you think? Why don't we just put cigarette vending machines in the schools in order to fund our no smoking campaign? Finally, we all have to just say "No!" when we are asked if we want to supersize a meal, and complain loudly about how large serving sizes have become. Have you seen a "regular" drink in a movie theatre recently?

The picture above is almost certainly photoshopped, but it's cute, isn't it?

Rebecca and I have watched a few episodes of a new reality show in which spouses get "swapped" into different families for a week and one of the ways that the producers of the show attempt to shake things up is by making one family well-to-do, and the other lower middle class or poor. The results are not as lopsided as you might think.

The rich families are prone to pathologies too, it's just that some of them are easily hidden, and not always recognized as pathological. A patronizing arrogance and greed are very common flaws in the rich families. Generally, however, they are not lazy. They work very hard, and most are in pretty good shape (but not all).

The poorer families, however, eat amazingly badly. That is probably one of the most striking things we've seen. Their food is fat and it's fried, all the time. Veggies are described as "nasty." Portion sizes are huge and Physical activity is lacking. Laziness is a often factor too.

The Phys. Ed. Manitoba is doing will almost certainly benefit poorer families most, especially if combined with nutrional information. Kids don't cook, but they can try to share information with parents. It's hard to argue with the policy, just don't even think that a government program alone can have any real impact. The biggest influence is the home, not the school, an no amount of programs will change that.

Posted by Hello

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi