Skip to main content

Links!

It seems quite a few Canadian bloggers are getting serious spikes in traffic as people here try to get around justice Gomery's publication ban on some of the testimony. Not on this blog, however. I don't think I've mentioned Gomery's name enough. I might try to share some thoughts about publications bans later tonight. We'll see how I do with time management. In any case, the day to day ins and outs of poltics isn't what I do here. In the meantime... We whose poverty survives affluence and plenty... John Paul passed away on during the early morning hours of the feast of the Polish Saint Maria Faustina Kowalska, whose feast day is known as "Divine Mercy. " She was made a saint by JPII. I don't get too carried away with Saints' stories, which can be a bit wacky, but that is kind of interesting. More on this story here. Africa's Cardinal Arinze is an interesting contender to be the next Pope. He's popular with some, I suspect, simply because he's black (see the Mark Steyn link below for more on that). He is also a traditionalist and I'm willing to bet that liberals will abandon him in droves as soon as he says anything like what he said at Georgetown University in 2003. I can hear the cries of 'uncle Tom' already. It would be Margaret Thatcher all over again. There are other reasons to think he might be just what is needed, however. He is said to be good with Christian - Muslim relations. NRO's Thomas Hibbs looks at JPII's philosophy and makes an interesting observation:
John Paul detects both naiveté and a proclivity toward excess in the otherwise admirable modern celebration of human freedom. (The point here is not far from Tocqueville's insight, which can be traced back to Aristotle's study of regimes, that the exaggeration of the dominant principle of a regime can be its undoing.) There is a tendency, the pope writes, "to exalt freedom to such an extent that it becomes an absolute, which would then be the source of values." The radicalization of the modern project... severs the bond between freedom and truth. The result is a persistent flirtation with nihilism or what John Paul calls "the culture of death," a temptation whose roots are masked by our continued use of the noble-sounding language of dignity and freedom. What appears to elevate and dignify actually trivializes. If there is no standard, except that bestowed upon it by the agent himself, in light of which we can appraise choices as better or worse, good or evil, then every choice is equally reasonable and good or, for that matter, equally meaningless.
In plain English, freedom isn't free. It has enemies without - and within. At Right Reason, Roger Kimball writes of the last pope:
The priest who officiated at my wedding opined that John Paul was the most important Pope-theologian since Gregory the Great. Gregory died in 604, so there has been a lot of competition. Still, I suspect my friend was right... He was... our advocate: we whose poverty survives affluence and plenty. For us, John Paul saw, the great temptations were nihilism -- the rejection of meaning and the repudiation of truth -- and scientism, "the illusion that, thanks to scientific and technical progress, man and woman may live as a demiurge, single-handedly and completely taking charge of their destiny." We are not demiurges, only fallible human beings.
Mark Steyn also has some interesting things to say about John Paul. I can't quote and do him justice, you'll have to check it out for yourself. Get Religion writes ably about the NY Times' journalistic tricks, as evidenced by their 'insert quote here' gaffe on the Pope's passing:
"False balance," on the other hand, is when a reporter or news team has a very one-sided, slanted story written and then, to add balance, will call one person on the other side for one paragraph of protest to the revealed truths contained in the news report.
Don't think the CBC doesn't do this too. Stephen Bainbridge writes that JPII's grasp of economics was better than that of most theologians. There's something to this. I've read a lot of dreadful economic analysis from Catholics writers and thinkers who are out of their league on this subject.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi