Skip to main content

More on the illness of JPII

EWTN offers a Q&A on how the Vatican is operating with the Pope being so ill as to be incapacitated. Writer Amy Wellborn has published a letter from one her readers that gets to the heart of it:
Don't get me wrong: I love the Pope and he is one of my heroes. But at the same time he is an old man, and old men die eventually. And if they are holy old men, as I believe the Pope to be, they go to be with their heavenly Father. So I don't worry about John Paul's health. I know that he will die some day, and I know that if he does the church will live on with a new pope. There's no reason for anxiety. Is this crazy? Am I abnormal or unfeeling? Years ago I read that this phenomenon is nothing new --- every time a pope gets ill the media always go out and shoot pictures of people -worried Catholics, supposedly - lighting candles in churches. The writer, a Catholic, pointed out that had the cameras gone into the same churches on any other day they would have captured --- people lighting candles. It's what we do, for reasons that might not have anything at all to do with the Pope's health. In short, the media seem convinced that Catholic faith depends on the Pope alone, as if we should be worried that if the Pope dies our faith dies.
Still, knowing this, it is not easy for those of us who are fond of this Pope to see him like this. His visit to Toronto for World Youth Day was one of the events that got me to thinking about Catholicism. Before that, I was just another vaguely secular conservative. Should he pass away, he will be missed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect
Post a Comment
Read more

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you
Post a Comment
Read more

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi
Post a Comment
Read more