Skip to main content

Links!

What philosophy do you follow? Is Philosophy becoming more popular with the young? This essay shows why rhetoric about how expanding rights is always a virtue should be resisted. Robert Heinlein was on to something when he came up with TANSTAAFL (there ain't no such thing as a free lunch). Ann Coulter tells a surprising story that I don't think made it to Canada's MSM. Maybe I missed it. The American Spectator has a fine and provocative essay by George Neumayr on bystanders' fascination with the upcoming Papal Conclave:
Why would people who hate the Church pose as reformers who know what's best for it? Why would they care so passionately about the direction of a religion to which they don't belong? For the same reason the French philosophes and revolutionaries monitored and pressured the Church: it is a force that they must either neutralize or hijack in order to achieve their designs for the world. Look at the immense, obsessional energy that the left spends on trying to pressure the Church into green-lighting their favorite sexual sins. Why do they care so much about what the Church teaches? The reason is that they know that if they could just get the Catholic Church's imprimatur on the Sexual Revolution it would spread everywhere. A liberal Pope, as far as they are concerned, would be even better than a liberal Chief Justice on the Supreme Court.
The Polish choose life:
Polish pro-life leader Lech Kowalewski told LifeSiteNews.com that Poland, with a similar population to Canada (30+ million), had the same number of abortions (100,000 + per year) under communism. However, with liberation came the right to life and the latest abortion figures reveal fewer than 200 abortions per year.
Orson Scott Card (who is a Mormon, I believe) has good things to say about JPII, as does British historian Paul Johnson. Not surprisingly, Andrew Sullivan does not have nice things to say. He'd be easier to take if he actually made any sense. "Wojtyla leveraged this new stardom to reassert a far older idea of the papacy--as the central, unaccountable force in the Church." WTF? Does Sullivan really buy that JP was an autocrat? The former Pope was bound by tradition as best he knew it, which is nowhere near the same thing. Neumayr's criticism in the above entry describes Sullivan's attack perfectly.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wordpress

My move to Mac has been very happy except for two issues - gaming and blogging. For websurfing and multimedia, a Mac is of course a terrific machine. Games on the Mac platform are often ports of games made for the larger PC market and that means a Mac gamer will have to wait for the port. I'm not a heavy gamer by any means but I am very happy that the Mac port of Civilization 4 is finally here. Well, my copy isn't here quite yet - but it has been ordered and ought to be here soon. The blogging issue is more complicated. I'm not fond of writing my posts in a browser window. This goes back to when I was first blogging and I lost one or two large posts into the ether. After that I moved to w.bloggar - a great little app that let me compose on my desktop and then click send when all was said and done. I have not been able to recreate that experience on my Mac, and not for a lack of trying! I looked at Marsedit , but that forces you to compse while staring at a bunch of HMT...
Post a Comment
Read more

Da Vinci: It bleats, it leads

The trouble with The DaVinci code is certainly this : the fundamentals of the Christian creed can be summarized in a few sentences easily learned by schoolchildren and recited aloud from memory by the whole congregation on Sunday. They are great mysteries to be sure - Trinity, incarnation, redemption, salvation, crucifixion, resurrection - but they are simple enough to explain. Contrast that with the account Mr. Brown offers of a centuries-long fraud, sustained by shadowy groups, imperial politics, ruthless brutality and latterly revealed by a secret code "hidden" in one of the world's most famous paintings. The Christian Gospel offers a coherent, comprehensible account of reality that invites the assent of faith. It requires a choice with consequences. Mr. Brown's dissent from Christianity offers a bewildering and incredible amalgam of falsehoods and implausibilities, painting a picture of a world in which the unenlightened are subject to the manipulations of the fe...
Post a Comment
Read more