Skip to main content

Brain and Maturity

From The Washington Post via Dissecting Leftism:
About as thick and wide as a silver dollar, [the dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortex, just behind the brow] distinguishes humans from other animals. From it, scientists believe, come judgments and values, long-term goals, the weighing of risks and consequences -- what parents call wisdom or common sense and what science calls "executive functions." While society and tradition have placed the point of intellectual maturity, the "age of reason," years earlier, the study -- an international effort led by NIH's Institute of Mental Health and UCLA's Laboratory of Neuro Imaging -- shows it comes at about age 25.
This is an absolutely fascinating find. My wife and I both attest to the fact that our twenty fifth year was very important to us. It was a turning point on which we are still building. I don't mean religious conversion - that happened much later. What seems to have happened is that our ability to critically evaluate things went up tremendously. Amazing that there might be some science to back our claims up. I've heard similar stories from others as well. The article spends a lot of time talking about teens and driving, which is a very immediate and practical consideration. What really interests me, however, is that these finding seem to squash an entire mode of parenting, the kind that wants to be a kid's friend, the kind that refuses to offer solid and critical leadership when doing so is unpleasant. "Who am I to judge?" "It's what he wants." Well, you're the adult, aren't you? They may not say it until much later, but I think kids want and value adult leadership. Their questioning is a way of learning and internalizing. Laissez faire parenting is too close to indifference, which is what strangers give. Parents are supposed to care and criticsize. Last thought. During ancient times, and into the early middle ages, most of the population did not live much past thirty. That might explain some of the violence and difficulty we associate with the period. Of course, not everyone kicked off at thirty. There is very good literature and philosophy found right back into the furthest reaches of history.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi