Skip to main content

God's Timing

Religion and political Transformation This is Life! has a very interesting post on much the same subject as my last post, that there exist often overlooked similarities between Fundamentalists and Liberals, and that implies that there are differences between those groups and Orthodoxy. I am willing to talk and to work with all sorts of people, and blogging is sure a wonderful way to meet them and learn first hand that those with whom you disagree are flesh and blood people trying to make sense of the world as best they can. I am clear in my own mind about the difference between Orthodox and Fundamentalist but its also clear that this is a nuance that eludes many, especially those who are not church going, or who do not penetrate their faith deeply, for whatever reason. I respect friends and readers who take a different path, but I want to be clear about how our approaches differ. From This is Life!:
First and foremost, we oppose things like abortion and women's ordination for completely different reasons than the conservative evangelicals and fundamentalist Christians. For us, the way of life handed down by Jesus to his Apostles knows nothing of these things, and that is why we do not accept them. They are foreign to the Church's experience. And, indeed, the Church has clearly rejected them as practices compatible with Life in Christ. For conservative evangelicals and fundamentalists, these things are wrong because they have constructed an interpretation of Scripture such that "the Bible says" these things are wrong. Our stance is founded on and in the two thousand year old mind and life of the Church. Theirs is on an interpretation, which, however sincerely held today, may give way to a new sincerely held interpretation tomorrow. ... In fact, from our vantage point, socially and politically liberal Protestants have much more in common with their conservative and fundamentalist Protestant opponents than do we traditionalists. Both liberal and fundamentalist Protestants advance their agendas and causes on the back of their own interpretations of Scripture. They practice essentially the same hermeneutic, but allow different premises to shape their conclusions. Even when they sincerely try to let the Tradition have a voice in their interpretations, it is merely one voice among many, and if it does not fit their presuppositions, it is ignored along with all the rest they reject.

Not only that, but both socially and politically conservative evangelicals and fundamentalist and their socially and politically liberal Protestant opponents even practice the same form of social transformation, that of political enforcement, albeit they are mirror images of one another. Whether it is the American Family Association's grassroots political action alerts or the Episcopal Church's political efforts at General Convention 2003, both agendas share the same spirit and the same dynamic--both are impatient of God's timing and seek to achieve by humans means what they claim is of the Spirit.

Notice how NWW has never satisfied itself with advocating winning political power and has always taken the stand that any true alteration in society must come from the bottom - up, from the culture to the seats of law and power?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect

Where credit is due

A good'un from Sawyer Brown . Thank God for You Well I've been called a self-made man Girl don't you believe it's true I know exactly how lucky I am When I'm gettin' this close to you It's high time I'm giving some praise To those that got me where I am today Chorus I got to thank momma for the cookin' Daddy for the whuppin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you A strong heart and a willing hand That's the secret to my success A good woman - I try to be a good man A good job - Lord I know I've been blessed I'm just a part of a greater plan It doesn't matter which part I am Chorus I got to thank momma for the teachin' Daddy for the preachin' The devil for the trouble that I get into I got to give credit where credit is due I thank the bank for the money Thank God for you

A very limited form of inquiry

Real Clear Politics is carrying commentary on James Q. Wilson's WSJ article on ID (got that?). Wilson, the respected social scientist, gets it mostly right when he says that ID is not science because it can't be tested: So ID is not science. Does this mean that science, in any way, implies the non-existence of God? No. Does this mean that belief in God is irrational and that we should all be "free thinkers"? No. Does this mean that it is impossible to arbitrate between various theories of the existence/non-existence of God and come to some reasonable conclusions? No. Does this mean that we cannot say that humanity is meant to exist? No. In other words, rationality outside of science is quite possible, and has been around for a long time. How do you think humanity invented science in the first place? We surely did not do it scientifically. Science as we know it is the product of millennia of philosophical debate -- from Aristotle to Lakatos. Science depends upon phi