Skip to main content

The Problem with "Progress"

Wherever you go, there you are Progress is a favourite shibboleth of the left. As "liberal" becomes a non starter in the United States, some are already dropping that word for the term "progressive." As if this was about somehow about words rather than ideas! The success of that project is dependent on who uses the word. If it is those who think that the Democrats are failing because they are not left enough, no word will give them the aura of respectability they seek. What is this idea that they think it will help them and why does it apply to them and not to others? Where does it come from and where is it going? That's the trouble. No one knows. Vaguely it means things get more complex and somehow better. How do we know it's better? *shrug* It's progressing, isn't it? Here's what C.S. Lewis had to say about progress:
As a force for emergent evolution, if anyone insists on using the word God to mean "whatever the universe happens to be going to do next," of course we cannot prevent him. But nobody would in fact use it unless he had a secret belief that what is coming next would be an improvement. Such a belief, besides being unwarranted, presents peculiar difficulties to an emergent evolutionist. If things can improve, this means that there is some absolute standard of good above and outside the cosmic process to which that standard can approximate. There is no sense in talking of "becoming better" if better means simply "what we are becoming" - it is like congratulating yourself on reaching your destination and defining your destination as "the place your have reached."
Taken from "Evil and God," an essay from the book, God in the Dock, which is a much, much better book than Robert Wright's Nonzero.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Hiatus will be blogged

This hiatus thing isn't going to plan. As I'm reading (books and blogs) I find things I think are interesting, or things I would like an opinion on, and bingo, my hiatus is in a shambles. So, *coughs*, until further notice, I'm blogging again. The main editorial difference that I can see coming from my few weeks away is that I do not expect to resume posting six out of seven days a week. There could be, at any time and without warning, a break of a week or two between posts. Really, I think that is the only way I can start to get some books behind me, and is also inevitable in the summer season when one wants to get out and enjoy it all. Here's a few things that got my attention this past week. Chris Taylor is blogging once again and has recruited an air force for the Red Ensign Brigade. Heh. Dennis Prager asks, Are you a liberal? Anglicans and Catholics are getting closer to reconciling -over the role of Mary in the Christian faith. Quote: A working group c...

Ghost in the machine

In writing up this post I have to mention that I am very impressed with the quality of discussion that one finds on blogs. This truly is a remarkable medium. Thanks go to all three of the bloggers mentioned here for providing such good reading and thinking for the rest of us to try and learn from. I have not had a chance to read all of the entries linked to here, but I do intend to. ***** George Will compares two views of man in his latest column . One is novelist Ian McEwan, who places the following words into the mouth of the leading character in his latest novel, Saturday : Endless and beautiful forms of life, such as you see in a common hedgerow, including exulted beings like ourselves, arose from physical laws, from war or nature, famine and death. This is the grandeur. And a bracing kind of consolation in the brief privilege of consciousness. This character is a neurosurgeon. The quote reminds me that there may be some truth to the observation that those in the biological and...