Skip to main content

The Problem with "Progress"

Wherever you go, there you are Progress is a favourite shibboleth of the left. As "liberal" becomes a non starter in the United States, some are already dropping that word for the term "progressive." As if this was about somehow about words rather than ideas! The success of that project is dependent on who uses the word. If it is those who think that the Democrats are failing because they are not left enough, no word will give them the aura of respectability they seek. What is this idea that they think it will help them and why does it apply to them and not to others? Where does it come from and where is it going? That's the trouble. No one knows. Vaguely it means things get more complex and somehow better. How do we know it's better? *shrug* It's progressing, isn't it? Here's what C.S. Lewis had to say about progress:
As a force for emergent evolution, if anyone insists on using the word God to mean "whatever the universe happens to be going to do next," of course we cannot prevent him. But nobody would in fact use it unless he had a secret belief that what is coming next would be an improvement. Such a belief, besides being unwarranted, presents peculiar difficulties to an emergent evolutionist. If things can improve, this means that there is some absolute standard of good above and outside the cosmic process to which that standard can approximate. There is no sense in talking of "becoming better" if better means simply "what we are becoming" - it is like congratulating yourself on reaching your destination and defining your destination as "the place your have reached."
Taken from "Evil and God," an essay from the book, God in the Dock, which is a much, much better book than Robert Wright's Nonzero.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wordpress

My move to Mac has been very happy except for two issues - gaming and blogging. For websurfing and multimedia, a Mac is of course a terrific machine. Games on the Mac platform are often ports of games made for the larger PC market and that means a Mac gamer will have to wait for the port. I'm not a heavy gamer by any means but I am very happy that the Mac port of Civilization 4 is finally here. Well, my copy isn't here quite yet - but it has been ordered and ought to be here soon. The blogging issue is more complicated. I'm not fond of writing my posts in a browser window. This goes back to when I was first blogging and I lost one or two large posts into the ether. After that I moved to w.bloggar - a great little app that let me compose on my desktop and then click send when all was said and done. I have not been able to recreate that experience on my Mac, and not for a lack of trying! I looked at Marsedit , but that forces you to compse while staring at a bunch of HMT...

Da Vinci: It bleats, it leads

The trouble with The DaVinci code is certainly this : the fundamentals of the Christian creed can be summarized in a few sentences easily learned by schoolchildren and recited aloud from memory by the whole congregation on Sunday. They are great mysteries to be sure - Trinity, incarnation, redemption, salvation, crucifixion, resurrection - but they are simple enough to explain. Contrast that with the account Mr. Brown offers of a centuries-long fraud, sustained by shadowy groups, imperial politics, ruthless brutality and latterly revealed by a secret code "hidden" in one of the world's most famous paintings. The Christian Gospel offers a coherent, comprehensible account of reality that invites the assent of faith. It requires a choice with consequences. Mr. Brown's dissent from Christianity offers a bewildering and incredible amalgam of falsehoods and implausibilities, painting a picture of a world in which the unenlightened are subject to the manipulations of the fe...