Skip to main content

Prudent Martyrdom

Brother, can you spare a cause? In my series on Russell Kirk (not finished yet - one more point to go, and, perhaps, more to come after that) I talked briefly about Prudence. Today I find that David Warren has written (more and better, as usual) on the subject recently too. David contrasts the Christian view of Prudence with two modern views that take exception to it - the suicide bomber and the "tolerant" liberal.

As a Christian, I cannot be opposed to martyrdom, per se. So it is important to grasp the difference between what makes a Christian, and what makes this kind of Muslim, martyr. At the very least, the Christian requires to be put to death by someone else; and only as the alternative to denying Christ. He must go out of his way not to endanger persons not involved, since martyrdom can do no good to someone unprepared for it.

It is necessary to make this distinction, in order to understand how, in extremis, not only Christians, but Jews, and some people of other faiths, have been able through the centuries to choose martyrdom, as a prudent act -- each believing that his own death is for the good of all people, including himself.

This seems shocking to the post-modern mind, for which self-preservation, if not actual cowardice, is the highest prudential good.

To the Christian mind (and Jewish, Muslim, Hindu), the future of man and the world is in God's hands, and we have no more power over it than over tsunamis. So the idea of preserving ourselves, even as a species over the longest term, is vain. ...

The Church has taught through the centuries, on solid Biblical grounds, that "prudence" is among the highest virtues; that it would be actually sinful to act without taking stock of the consequences of our actions. The refusal is one of the things that drives me wild about Christian "liberals" -- who think they are holy when they have done something "altruistic", and deem irrelevant what the immediate consequences must be for others.

The last quoted paragraph struck me quite hard. Churchgoers are often accused of being robotic and Catholic liturgy and prayer can indeed be seen from the outside as very robotic. That's because the action is all on the inside. Prudence is what keeps us from blindly following rules (Mark 7:1) and it is held in a higher regard, generally, by the religious. Prudence evaluates custom and the present situation in virtue of furthering the highest Law - "Love one another as I have loved you." Indeed, prudence is what remembers that the highest law even exists. The general public thinks prudence is ridiculous, and the ridicule often seems to increase as one's education climbs. This ridicule of prudence is one of the causes of liberal extremism (not all liberals are extreme). Liberal arguments often will take the form of saying they have fulfilled some virtue (Iraq: do not kill; life issues: tolerance and "love"; welfare: there's never enough) without much regard to other virtues that need to be balanced against it. They will accuse religious conservatives of being hypocrites who do not follow their own faith when the conservative is merely speaking to the need for balance, for moderation and for awareness of probable unintended consequences. The liberal does not follow rules per se like a robot, but he often gives the impression of acting robotically as an champion of some particular cause over and against another, and of claiming that this unbalanced devotion is the virtue of the enlightened martyr.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters joins CNN on the bench

Makes room for CanWest to join the majors Kudos to CanWest for calling a terrorist a terrorist . Many, including The Last Amazon , will be happy to hear it. Reuters is among the worst of the major western news services, where I would also place the BBC and the CBC. Unsurprisingly, Reuters is not happy about the changes CanWest made to Reuters wire stories: Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline." Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations. "My goal is to protect ...

Wordpress

My move to Mac has been very happy except for two issues - gaming and blogging. For websurfing and multimedia, a Mac is of course a terrific machine. Games on the Mac platform are often ports of games made for the larger PC market and that means a Mac gamer will have to wait for the port. I'm not a heavy gamer by any means but I am very happy that the Mac port of Civilization 4 is finally here. Well, my copy isn't here quite yet - but it has been ordered and ought to be here soon. The blogging issue is more complicated. I'm not fond of writing my posts in a browser window. This goes back to when I was first blogging and I lost one or two large posts into the ether. After that I moved to w.bloggar - a great little app that let me compose on my desktop and then click send when all was said and done. I have not been able to recreate that experience on my Mac, and not for a lack of trying! I looked at Marsedit , but that forces you to compse while staring at a bunch of HMT...

"A whale-ship was my Yale College and my Harvard"

This article argues that universities are obsolete . Herman Melville said that "a whale-ship was my Yale College and my Harvard." Melville didn't need college to write "Moby Dick." He needed to read and spend time in the world. Before sailing out on a whaler in 1841, he had already worked on his uncle's farm and as a cabin boy on a ship to England. Peter Drucker urged high-school graduates to do likewise: Work for at least five years. If they went on to college, it would be as grown-ups. You wonder whether colleges, stripped of their education function, wouldn't find other lives as spas, professional-sports franchises or perhaps lightly supervised halfway houses for post-adolescents. The infrastructure is already in place. Putting aside the intellectual class' obsession with things passing and thus bringing the great moment of cosmic progression to a thundering conclusion (yawn), I do think there's something to this. The potential of the podcas...