Skip to main content

The Revolution of 1982

"... what we are and aspire to be is organized around the protection of equality rights, the protection of minority rights." Irwin Colter, Canada's Justice Minister
Really? Is that "what we are?" Or is that what Canada's elite wants?
The profound change took place with the adoption of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That was a constitutional revolution of 1982. Without that understanding nothing else can really be appreciated, and that’s where the transformative change took place; with respect to moving from a parliamentary democracy to a constitutional democracy; from the sovereignty of Parliament to the sovereignty of the Constitution; from the court’s as being arbiters of legal federalism to the courts being guarantors of human rights, because we Parliament, vested them with the authority to do so, and perhaps most important with individuals, groups, minorities now having a panoply of rights and remedies to go before the courts and secure protection for these right and remedies. Now individuals, groups and minorities are rights holders. We are rights claimants. Without that context, without an appreciation of the revolutionary change brought by the charter, we can’t understand how we have gotten where we are now…”
Is Coulter saying that Parliament really is bound by the courts? That the notwithstanding clause is illegitimate? That the Constitution was sold under a bait and switch tactic? If that's so, the constitution is illegitimate. But then these guys live on the bait and switch. They were going to do away with the GST, remember? They voted to back traditional marriage, remember? To answer by saying "oh, look at the time" is a bit much. Question for Coulter: Who will protect us from having to provide rights? Rights are not free. They are paid for by accommodation and by blood, sweat and tears. That is why they ought not to be placed out of the reach of elected officials. I would love to see the Liberals thrown out in a defeat that makes 1993 look like a tea party. Mulroney at his worst was nothing like this. I sincerely hope that Paul Martin is the worst Prime Minister I ever have to live under. He's on a pace to replace Trudeau in that regard. Maybe this is next? In the (very) long run little old me wants a constitution that limits government rights and leaves the rest of us largely alone. I want an accountable government, not one that hides behind the skirts of its robed masters, who in turn, through the farce of "living document" readings, become a law unto themsleves. If you belive in what you say, then run on it! Enough of your contempt. Tip: Leftists as Elitists ****** See Peter Rempelia's comments here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wordpress

My move to Mac has been very happy except for two issues - gaming and blogging. For websurfing and multimedia, a Mac is of course a terrific machine. Games on the Mac platform are often ports of games made for the larger PC market and that means a Mac gamer will have to wait for the port. I'm not a heavy gamer by any means but I am very happy that the Mac port of Civilization 4 is finally here. Well, my copy isn't here quite yet - but it has been ordered and ought to be here soon. The blogging issue is more complicated. I'm not fond of writing my posts in a browser window. This goes back to when I was first blogging and I lost one or two large posts into the ether. After that I moved to w.bloggar - a great little app that let me compose on my desktop and then click send when all was said and done. I have not been able to recreate that experience on my Mac, and not for a lack of trying! I looked at Marsedit , but that forces you to compse while staring at a bunch of HMT...

Da Vinci: It bleats, it leads

The trouble with The DaVinci code is certainly this : the fundamentals of the Christian creed can be summarized in a few sentences easily learned by schoolchildren and recited aloud from memory by the whole congregation on Sunday. They are great mysteries to be sure - Trinity, incarnation, redemption, salvation, crucifixion, resurrection - but they are simple enough to explain. Contrast that with the account Mr. Brown offers of a centuries-long fraud, sustained by shadowy groups, imperial politics, ruthless brutality and latterly revealed by a secret code "hidden" in one of the world's most famous paintings. The Christian Gospel offers a coherent, comprehensible account of reality that invites the assent of faith. It requires a choice with consequences. Mr. Brown's dissent from Christianity offers a bewildering and incredible amalgam of falsehoods and implausibilities, painting a picture of a world in which the unenlightened are subject to the manipulations of the fe...